I awoke this morning to a bright flash of light. At first I thought I was imagining it, or maybe I tore a retina, but then I heard a long rumble which I determined to be thunder. I was relieved to say the least, but also a little surprised. I wasn’t expecting any rain. I can’t even remember the last time it rained here, it’s been that long.

At least now I have an excuse for not going on a bike ride today. Monday is usually a day off, but since today is a holiday, I was considering it. I’ll just go with my normal routine, and go to the gym instead.

The only problem is, it’s going to be difficult getting my allotment of vitamin D today. While the threat of rain is supposed to dissipate by early morning, the forecast is for partly cloudy conditions throughout the day, which could make it a little more problematic receiving enough UVB rays necessary for Vitamin D production.

Oh well, such is life. Everyday can’t be perfect, and yesterday was a beautiful day.

Hopefully I have enough vitamin D stored up from past exposures to get me by!

Post to Twitter

 

As it turns out, just about everything. It’s just no one seems to want to tout its benefits, which there is an explanation for!

For starters, it’s free! So there’s no incentive for the pharmaceutical or supplement industries to tout its benefits. [They can't sell you sunlight].

And the sunscreen industry doesn’t want you to know [moderate] direct exposure to sunlight (you just don’t want to burn) is actually beneficial, because that realization would mean lower sales of sunscreen products. Remember, they’ve built an entire industry based on the fact sunlight is bad for you.

Well, it’s time we stop believing everything we hear, and start questioning the motives of some. Remember what I said in a previous post

Don’t be stupid. Everyone has an agenda, and it most likely isn’t to benefit you.

As it turns out, it is estimated that 75% of teens and adults may be vitamin D deficient.

So what are some of the benefits of Vitamin D?

It is crucial for the absorption and metabolism of calcium and phosphorous, which have various functions, especially the maintenance of healthy bones.

It is an immune system regulator.

It may be an important way to arm the immune system against disorders like the common cold, say scientists from the University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Children’s Hospital Boston.

It may reduce the risk of developing multiple sclerosis. Multiple sclerosis is much less common the nearer you get to the tropics, where there is much more sunlight, according to Dennis Bourdette, chairman of the Department of Neurology and director of the Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology Center at Oregon Health and Science University, USA.

Vitamin D may have a key role in helping the brain to keep working well in later life, according to a study of 3000 European men between the ages of 40 and 79.

Vitamin D is probably linked to maintaining a healthy body weight, according to research carried out at the Medical College of Georgia, USA.

It can reduce the severity and frequency of asthma symptoms, and also the likelihood of hospitalizations due to asthma, researchers from Harvard Medical School found after monitoring 616 children in Costa Rica.

It has been shown to reduce the risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis in women.

A form of vitamin D could be one of our body’s main protections against damage from low levels of radiation, say radiological experts from the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.

Various studies have shown that people with adequate levels of vitamin D have a significantly lower risk of developing cancer, compared to people with lower levels. Vitamin D deficiency was found to be prevalent in cancer patients regardless of nutritional status, in a study carried out by Cancer Treatment Centers of America.

If you want more information about vitamin D, I recommend visiting The Vitamin D Council website, but what follows are a couple of points I thought were worth highlighting.

There are only two ways to get Vitamin D in the amounts necessary for proper health: Ultraviolet B (UVB) exposure and vitamin D supplementation. Diet should not be considered a satisfactory source of vitamin D. The few foods which do contain vitamin D, contain too little to be of any noticeable benefit.

For vitamin D production, sun exposure should be midday between the hours of approximately 10am-2pm (11am-3pm during daylight savings time). These hours will vary slightly according to latitude. The closer to solar noon, the more vitamin D produced.

But if you live above the 35th parallel, then you have to contend with what is known as “vitamin D winter”, when you can’t get Vitamin D from the sun, and you must resort to supplements. See note below!

Estimated Vitamin D Winter months according to latitude:

  • Latitudes from zero degrees to around 35º north or south allow year-round vitamin D production, though the amount produced will decrease as latitude increases.3,5(South of a line extending from just north of LA to just north of Atlanta)
  • Latitudes above 40º north will experience Vitamin D Winter from around November through early March. (Salt Lake City is about 40º north)
  • Latitudes below 40º south, around June through August. (Wellington, NZ is about 41º south, and Melbourne Australia is about 37 degrees south)
  • Latitudes above 50º north, October through early April.(London England is 51º north)
  • Latitudes below 50º south, mid-April through July.4(The Falkland Islands and Ushuaia fall into that category)

Fortunately I live at 34º north latitude, but a good rule of thumb is:

If your shadow is longer than you are tall (an indicator of the oblique angle of the Sun), you are not making much vitamin D.

While I am against supplementation of any kind, I recognize the fact many people live in areas where it is just not possible to get the needed vitamin D all year round. Therefore for those who may experience a Vitamin D winter (referenced above), I reluctantly recommend a Vitamin D supplement.

Just be careful not to overdose on supplementsToo much vitamin D can be harmful. The body has a self regulating mechanism which prevents overdosing on vitamin D from the sun, but there is no such mechanism when it comes to taking supplements.

So quit wasting your time on the computer (I got my 30 minutes of sun already today), and get outside, even if it’s only to just sit in the sun.

Post to Twitter

 

And as expected, I’m not vitamin D deficient. However, neither do I possess an over abundance of vitamin D either.  My vitamin D level was at 31 ng/mL. Reference range being 30 – 100 ng/mL.

Needless to say, I was very disappointed. With as much time as I spend outside riding my bike, I would have expected my levels to be much higher, but it sure makes the statistic, 77% of all Americans may also be vitamin D deficient, a lot more believable.

I am certainly not happy entertaining the thought of having to take a vitamin D supplement. Being the cynic I am, I have a general distrust of the pharmaceutical and supplement industries, but there seems to be overwhelming evidence of the harm resulting from a vitamin D deficiency, including an additional risk of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and even immune-system disorders, lymphoma being considered in the latter category.

So I’ve resigned myself to take a vitamin D supplement. My friend, and medical expert, recommended I take 2000 IU per day, and my oncologist recommended 1000 IU per day. She knows how hesitant I am to take any sort of vitamins or supplements, so I know she’s just being accomodating, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to ignore that advice. [There are others who recommend taking a lot more.]

I went an purchased 120, 1000 IU tablets of vitamin D3. We’ll see how that goes over the next 4 months.

In the mean time, if you haven’t had your vitamin D levels checked, I would suggest you do so. Who knows, you may be surprised.

Post to Twitter

 

Well, I would have to say there was near perfect weather in Santa Barbara this past weekend for the California Wine Festival. The skies were clear, and the temperatures ranged from the mid 60′s to low 70′s. It doesn’t get much better than that, and it’s the main reason we love southern [and central] CA so much.

Of course, I can always find something to complain about. It’s just this time, it won’t be the weather.

My biggest complaint was I didn’t ride my bike for 3 days, and watching all the other cyclists riding along the beach, heading out for what was likely a brisk morning ride into the foothills, made me envious.

Then there was the fact, the hotel we stayed in wasn’t what I had expected. It was nice [sorta], and the price was right, but it just didn’t have the class nor the ambiance of the Fess Parker Doubletree Resort, or even the Hotel Mar Monte, both of which were on either side of us.

Oh, but so what! We didn’t go there for the room, or the ocean view. We went there for the wine, and there was lots of it. Three days worth. Most of which was pretty good. We even came across two wineries I think deserve mention. The first one being Cynthus, and the other Tercero.  I particularly liked the concept of Tercero. There are 4 different wine makers (who also work at some pretty prestigious wineries), who produce their own version of wine from the same grapes. It was fun comparing the different styles. And Cynthus, I thought made a good Cabernet Sauvignon.

Another problem, was while the event was billed as the California Wine Festival, it was mainly wineries from the central coast participating, and most of the wines were of the Rhone varietal. Now that’s not necessarily a bad thing (and had I read the website a little more closely, I would have known that), as I do enjoy Rhone wines, and Edie and I do need to expand our horizons from just Pinot Noir’s. Plus there was the token participation from wineries around the state.

All in all a good time was had, and I did get my share of much needed Vitamin D. Especially on my head. I probably should have worn a hat.

Post to Twitter

 

I had an appointment with my oncologist on Tuesday, and the one thing of note, besides the fact my numbers were essentially unchanged, was she made mention of the benefits discovered in cancer progression by increasing Vitamin D levels.

She researched other patients of hers, and discovered they were essentially all Vitamin D deficient, and recommended taking a Vitamin D supplement (1000 IU per day).

Considering the constant reinforcement [hype] by the dermatology lobby, and sun screen manufacturers, of the hazards of extended exposure to sunlight, the major source of Vitamin D, and me being the uber cynicist I am, I find that fact very believable.

She also knows I’m not much into taking supplements, plus I do get a lot of unprotected sun exposure when I ride my bike, but she put it out there for me to at least investigate.

So I did some research on the subject, and came across this very interesting article on the benefits of Vitamin D, performed at the Mayo Clinic, in newly diagnosed Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) patients.

Of course it was only one study, a relatively small sample, and it wasn’t even performed on Mantle Cell Lymphoma patients, so how much benefit it will be to me or others is still open to question. Heck, I’m not even sure I’m Vitamin D deficient (that will be checked next month), but none the less, the data is compelling, and IMO worth further consideration, if not for me, then at least others.

So even if you don’t like taking supplements [like myself], at least have your Vitamin D levels checked, and consider spending more time outside exposed to the sun, without using any sun block. If nothing else, at least it will get you out of the house, and doing something a little more beneficial than simply sitting around the house reading some blog. :)

Who knows, they may even discover it’s just one more benefit to exercising outside, beyond the obvious.

Post to Twitter

© 2011 Living with MCL Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha