Well, if you’re like me, you watched the 60 Minutes interview with Tyler Hamilton Sunday night, and like me, you’re probably even more confused now than ever.

Did he, or didn’t he? That is the question.

Tyler’s accusations of doping are certainly compelling, but just because he admitted to doping, doesn’t mean Lance did as well. Nor should we automatically accept what Tyler is saying as fact. After all, remember what I said before, everyone has an agenda. Plus Tyler is receiving limited immunity for his testimony.

As for me, I choose to believe Lance. Not only because I find it difficult to believe anyone who has survived cancer would take illicit drugs, but because with all the scrutiny he has endured, there has never been any evidence of a failed test.

But whether the accusations are true or not, what bothers me more than anything is our governments collosal waste of time and resources investigating these accusations.

With all the problems facing this country, why do some people feel it is necessary to waste so much valuable time and resources on something that can only result in pain and sorrow, when we should be focusing our attention on more beneficial endeavors?

Post to Twitter

 

As a result of several comments I received regarding my recent post referencing Steve Kirsch, I feel compelled to offer some clarification.

My intention was not to cast dispersions on Steve in particular. Steve has donated and been active in many philanthropic endeavors. The post was meant to cast a wide berth, and include everyone who has reached a particular stature in life, i.e. Steve Case (AOL), Sergey Brin (Google), Larry Ellison (Oracle) etc. and the vast majority of our elected representatives, who have the resources to make a REAL difference in the world, but IMO, choose to act only selfishly, without considering the plight of others, or don’t act at all.

I was referring to everyone who waits to put their resources to valuable use only for things that benefit themselves directly. Everyone who waits for a catastrophic event to spring into action. Everyone who needs to be embarrassed [chided] into acting before they are willing to help.

We have become….[snip]

Like I said in that previous post, what they’re doing

……… JUST ISN’T ENOUGH ………………

Post to Twitter

 

I came across this interesting article in this months San Francisco magazine. It’s about Steve Kirsch, a Silicon Valley entrepreneur, who founded several companies, including Infoseek, and his committed efforts, in time and money, to finding a cure for Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia, a disease he was diagnosed with in July of 2007.

The article also mentions several other high profile entrepreneurs, who have made similar commitments after being diagnosed with deadly diseases, including Steve Case (AOL), Sergey Brin (Google) and Larry Ellison (Oracle).

Now while I admire these individuals for what they have accomplished in their lives, and their efforts to fight their disease, for me it raises much larger questions. Why does it take a disaster or the diagnosis of a deadly disease to make people spring into action? And why are the efforts of these individuals only directed towards their particular diseases?

In my opinion, it just isn’t enough these individuals are trying to do something to help themselves, and others who are lucky [or unlucky] enough to be along for the ride. Where is their commitment to society? What about the millions of Americans (and millions of others around the world), fighting for their lives, but don’t have the resources of these individuals? Are they to be left out, and forgotten? Is everyone else not important enough?

Unless we start realizing how are actions affect each other, and that our lives are all interconnected, we are destined [doomed] to endure the same fate as those of the past and currently around the world.

Post to Twitter

 

Happy days are here again. Well, sorta-kinda-maybe.

One of the longest election cycles, in memory, has come to an end, and I can finally get back to watching live TV again.

Now while the election didn’t go exactly how I had hoped, and my faith in the intelligence of the American electorate took a big hit, fortunately [most] Californians did not get swept along in that same wave that has over taken much of the rest of the country.

All that remains now is to see what transpires over the next two years before all the insanity begins again, but at least I can take solace in the fact, I won’t have to listen to the likes of Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina any more.

Some things you just can’t put a price tag on.

Post to Twitter

 

But then I cried!

Proposition 20, removes elected representatives from the process of establishing congressional districts and transfers that authority to the recently-authorized 14-member redistricting commission comprised of Democrats, Republicans, and representatives of neither party.

Not necessarily a bad idea, but Proposition 27 eliminates the [recently-authorized] 14-member redistricting commission and consolidates the authority for establishing state Assembly, Senate and Board of Equalization districts with elected representatives who draw congressional districts.

That is just getting ridiculous! What happens if both propositions pass?

What California really needs is a proposition to end all propositions, or if we don’t want elected representatives to run the state, then how about a proposition to disband the legislature, and put everything up for a vote of the people [letting the special interests run the state]?

Post to Twitter

 

I’ve come to the realization I spend way to much time sitting in front of my computer. I’ve actually known this for a long time, but I just don’t seem to be able to do much about it.

Some of it is actually productive, like answering work emails, keeping track of my finances, and logging in my miles on the bike, but that only takes up a small portion of my time in front of the computer.

Too much time is spent playing around on Facebook, reading emails from other lymphoma survivors (OK, that might actually be considered worthwhile), and reading news and political commentary, sometimes even commenting when the urge arises.

Even writing this blog seems to occupy more time than I would like.

And now that I have my DroidX, I find myself spending even more time staring at a VDU (visual display unit).

Certainly the internet has been a boon to the world in many ways. Most notably for the amount of information that has been made much more readily available to everyone, and something I have availed myself of  tremendously, especially in the area of medicine. Without the internet, there is no doubt in my mind, I would not be in the position, health wise, I am today.

Of course, there is at least one caveat to all this, and that is, there is no one, or thing, filtering this information. There is no one, or thing, telling is what information is inaccurate, incomplete, misleading, highly suspect or an out right lie. We’re all left to our own devices to decide what is the truth or simply agenda driven.

Yes, there are organizations like factcheck.org and snopes.com, but by the time they’ve screened it, and printed their interpretation, the information has already made its rounds to the naive and unsuspecting, who accept it as gospel, without doing any additional investigation. Plus, who is to say those interpretations or comments aren’t suspect as well?

It’s a double edged sword, one we all need to be aware of, but unfortunately, I believe, too many of us are not.

Sometimes I still yearn for the ‘good ole days’, as I often like to say, before the internet. I get this way a lot, especially this time of year, when the days get shorter, and the weather more inclement, but life truly was so much simpler back then. My only question is, were we better off?

I’m not sure I can answer that question with any certainty. In fact, I’m not even sure there is a good answer.

Post to Twitter

© 2011 Living with MCL Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha